
Qingger
Add a review FollowVisión general
-
Seleccionar asesor comercial
-
Empleos publicados 0
-
(Visto) 7
Descripción de la compañía
Generative Expert System
Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly large language models (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu in addition to various smaller firms have actually developed generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]
Generative AI has utilizes throughout a vast array of industries, consisting of software development, health care, financing, entertainment, customer care, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] style, [18] and item style. [19] However, issues have actually been raised about the possible misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, the use of fake news or deepfakes to trick or manipulate people, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Intellectual property law issues also exist around generative models that are trained on and replicate copyrighted artworks. [22]
Early history
Since its creation, scientists in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of creating artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these issues have formerly been explored by myth, fiction and philosophy because antiquity. [23] The idea of automatic art dates back a minimum of to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where creators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were explained as having created makers efficient in composing text, producing sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of creative automations has actually thrived throughout history, exhibited by Maillardet’s automaton developed in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been used to design natural languages given that their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his very first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin utilizing Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is found out on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]
Academic expert system
The academic discipline of expert system was established at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced numerous waves of development and optimism in the years since. [31] Expert system research study began in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have actually used expert system to create creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and displaying generative AI works produced by AARON, the computer system program Cohen produced to produce paintings. [32]
The terms generative AI planning or generative preparation were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI preparing systems, particularly computer-aided process planning, used to produce series of actions to reach a specified objective. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems used symbolic AI approaches such as state space search and constraint complete satisfaction and were a “reasonably fully grown” technology by the early 1990s. They were utilized to produce crisis action strategies for military usage, [35] procedure prepare for producing [33] and decision plans such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]
Generative neural webs (2014-2019)
Since its beginning, the field of device learning used both discriminative designs and generative models, to design and forecast data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the emergence of deep learning drove progress and research in image classification, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other jobs. Neural networks in this era were generally trained as discriminative models, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]
In 2014, improvements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the first practical deep neural networks capable of learning generative models, rather than discriminative ones, for complicated data such as images. These deep generative designs were the first to output not only class labels for images however also entire images.
In 2017, the Transformer network allowed developments in generative models compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] resulting in the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which showed the capability to generalize without supervision to various tasks as a Structure design. [40]
The new generative models presented during this duration enabled big neural networks to be trained using not being watched learning or semi-supervised knowing, rather than the monitored learning normal of discriminative models. Unsupervised learning got rid of the requirement for people to by hand label data, allowing for bigger networks to be trained. [41]
Generative AI boom (2020-)
In March 2020, 15. ai, developed by an anonymous MIT scientist, was a free web application that might create persuading character voices using minimal training data. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content production, influencing subsequent advancements in voice AI technology. [43] [44]
In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further equalized access to premium artificial intelligence art production from natural language prompts. [46] These systems demonstrated unprecedented capabilities in generating photorealistic images, art work, and develops based upon text descriptions, resulting in prevalent adoption amongst artists, designers, and the general public.
In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT changed the ease of access and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based jobs. [47] The system’s capability to take part in natural conversations, produce innovative material, assist with coding, and carry out numerous analytical jobs recorded worldwide attention and stimulated prevalent discussion about AI’s prospective effect on work, education, and imagination. [48]
In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI abilities. A team from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “might fairly be considered as an early (yet still insufficient) version of a synthetic basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this evaluation was contested by other scholars who maintained that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the criteria of ‘basic human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI model integrating several methods including text, images, video, thermal information, 3D information, audio, and movement, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]
In December 2023, Google unveiled Gemini, a multimodal AI design available in four variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed prepare for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google combined Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, releasing a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]
In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 household of large language models, consisting of Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The models demonstrated significant improvements in capabilities throughout various benchmarks, with Claude 3 Opus notably exceeding leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed improved efficiency compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in areas such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]
According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has actually become a worldwide leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants utilizing the innovation, exceeding both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is additional evidenced by China’s copyright advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly going beyond the United States in patent applications. [58]
Modalities
A generative AI system is constructed by applying unsupervised machine knowing (conjuring up for instance neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised device learning trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend upon the modality or kind of the data set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For example, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]
Text
Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language models). They can natural language processing, machine translation, and natural language generation and can be used as foundation models for other jobs. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).
Code
In addition to natural language text, big language designs can be trained on shows language text, permitting them to produce source code for brand-new computer system programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]
Images
Producing high-quality visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly utilized for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).
Audio
Generative AI can also be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, launched in March 2020, which showed the capability to clone character voices utilizing just 15 seconds of training data. [67] The site got extensive attention for its ability to generate emotionally meaningful speech for various imaginary characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright issues. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives consequently emerged, including ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]
Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can also be trained on the audio waveforms of recorded music together with text annotations, in order to create new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a relaxing violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff.
Music
Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been generated, like the song Savages, which used AI to mimic rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t safeguarded from regenerative AI yet, raising a debate about whether artists ought to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]
Many AI music generators have been developed that can be generated utilizing a text expression, category alternatives, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]
Video
Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video clips. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]
Actions
Generative AI can also be trained on the movements of a robotic system to generate new trajectories for motion preparation or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research utilizes triggers like “choose up blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to manage motions of a robot arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out rudimentary reasoning in reaction to user prompts and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when given the prompt choice up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other items. [79]
3D modeling
Artificially intelligent computer-aided design (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might likewise be established utilizing connected open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to help simplify workflow. [82]
Software and hardware
Generative AI designs are utilized to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, programming tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have actually been integrated into a variety of existing commercially readily available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are likewise readily available as open-source software, consisting of Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language model.
Smaller generative AI designs with as much as a couple of billion specifications can operate on smart devices, embedded gadgets, and desktop computers. For example, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion specifications) can operate on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one variation of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]
Larger models with 10s of billions of specifications can run on laptop or home computer. To attain an appropriate speed, models of this size may require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine consisted of in Apple silicon products. For instance, the 65 billion criterion variation of LLaMA can be set up to work on a desktop PC. [91]
The advantages of running generative AI in your area include defense of privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular focuses on using consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such strategies as compression. That online forum is one of just two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language model standards. [93] Yann LeCun has actually promoted open-source designs for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI security. [95]
Language models with numerous billions of criteria, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, normally operate on datacenter computers geared up with varieties of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These huge models are typically accessed as cloud services over the Internet.
In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced limitations on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips utilized for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were established to fulfill the requirements of the sanctions.
There is free software application on the marketplace capable of recognizing text generated by generative artificial intelligence (such as GPTZero), in addition to images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for detecting generative AI content include digital watermarking, content authentication, information retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both complimentary and paid AI text detectors have actually frequently produced incorrect positives, erroneously implicating trainees of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]
Law and regulation
In the United States, a group of companies including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to require all US business to report details to the federal government when training particular high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]
In the European Union, the proposed Expert system Act includes requirements to reveal copyrighted product used to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]
In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China regulates any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark created images or videos, regulations on training data and label quality, limitations on individual information collection, and a guideline that generative AI should “comply with socialist core values”. [108] [109]
Copyright
Training with copyrighted material
Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, openly available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have actually argued that such training is protected under fair use, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights. [110]
Proponents of fair use training have argued that it is a transformative use and does not include making copies of copyrighted works available to the general public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can produce nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs compete with the material they are trained on. [112]
As of 2024, a number of lawsuits related to using copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has actually taken legal action against Stability AI over making use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have sued Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]
Copyright of AI-generated content
A separate concern is whether AI-generated works can receive copyright security. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works developed by synthetic intelligence with no human input can not be copyrighted, because they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the office has likewise started taking public input to identify if these rules require to be improved for generative AI. [117]
Concerns
The development of generative AI has actually raised concerns from governments, services, and people, leading to protests, legal actions, contacts us to pause AI experiments, and actions by numerous governments. In a July 2023 rundown of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned “Generative AI has enormous capacity for good and evil at scale”, that AI might “turbocharge global development” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the global economy by 2030, but that its destructive use “could trigger horrific levels of death and damage, prevalent trauma, and deep mental damage on an inconceivable scale”. [118]
Job losses
From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have actually been arguments put forward by ELIZA developer Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computer systems in fact should be done by them, given the difference in between computer systems and people, and in between quantitative estimations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually resulted in 70% of the jobs for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor disagreements. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, declared that “synthetic intelligence presents an existential hazard to imaginative occupations” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been seen as a prospective difficulty to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]
The crossway of AI and employment issues amongst underrepresented groups internationally remains a crucial facet. While AI promises efficiency improvements and skill acquisition, issues about task displacement and biased recruiting procedures continue among these groups, as outlined in studies by Fast Company. To leverage AI for a more fair society, proactive steps encompass mitigating biases, advocating openness, respecting personal privacy and consent, and embracing varied groups and ethical factors to consider. Strategies include redirecting policy focus on policy, inclusive style, and education’s potential for customized mentor to maximize advantages while lessening damages. [126]
Racial and gender predisposition
Generative AI models can show and enhance any cultural bias present in the underlying data. For instance, a language model might assume that doctors and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases prevail in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image model triggered with the text “a photo of a CEO” might disproportionately produce pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased information set. A variety of approaches for mitigating predisposition have actually been tried, such as altering input triggers [129] and reweighting training data. [130]
Deepfakes
Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “fake” [131] are AI-generated media that take an individual in an existing image or video and replace them with somebody else’s likeness using artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have amassed prevalent attention and concerns for their uses in deepfake celebrity adult videos, vengeance porn, phony news, scams, health disinformation, monetary fraud, and hidden foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has actually generated reactions from both market and federal government to detect and limit their usage. [140] [141]
In July 2023, the fact-checking company Logically found that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as images of electoral scams in the United States and Muslim females supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]
In April 2024, a paper proposed to utilize blockchain (distributed journal technology) to promote “openness, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and usage”. [144]
Audio deepfakes
Instances of users abusing software to generate controversial statements in the vocal design of celebrities, public authorities, and other well-known individuals have raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In response, companies such as ElevenLabs have mentioned that they would deal with mitigating prospective abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]
Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The same software application utilized to clone voices has been utilized on famous musicians’ voices to create tunes that simulate their voices, gaining both tremendous popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar methods have also been used to develop enhanced quality or full-length versions of songs that have actually been leaked or have yet to be released. [155]
Generative AI has actually also been used to produce new digital artist personalities, with some of these getting enough attention to get record offers at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually likewise faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, including backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise producing artists which create unrealistic or immoral appeals to their audiences. [157]
Cybercrime
Generative AI’s ability to develop practical phony content has actually been exploited in many kinds of cybercrime, including phishing rip-offs. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been utilized to create disinformation and scams. In 2020, former Google click fraud czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos become perfectly reasonable, they would stop appearing remarkable to audiences, potentially causing uncritical acceptance of false info. [159] Additionally, big language models and other kinds of text-generation AI have actually been utilized to create phony reviews of e-commerce sites to increase scores. [160] Cybercriminals have actually created large language models concentrated on scams, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]
A 2023 research study revealed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, enabling assaulters to obtain aid with damaging demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have actually demonstrated that open-source models can be fine-tuned to eliminate their security limitations at low expense. [163]
Reliance on industry giants
Training frontier AI models requires an enormous quantity of calculating power. Usually only Big Tech business have the monetary resources to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up purchasing access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]
Energy and environment
Scientists and reporters have actually expressed concerns about the environmental effect that the development and implementation of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large amounts of freshwater utilized for data centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical energy usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise concern that these effects might increase as these designs are integrated into extensively utilized online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as designs need to be re-trained. [170]
Proposed mitigation methods consist of factoring possible environmental expenses prior to model advancement or data collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of data centers to minimize electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] building more efficient maker discovering models, [168] [166] [169] decreasing the number of times that designs require to be retrained, [167] developing a government-directed structure for auditing the environmental effect of these designs, [168] [167] regulating for openness of these designs, [167] regulating their energy and water usage, [168] encouraging scientists to publish data on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject specialists who comprehend both device knowing and environment science. [167]
Content quality
The New York Times defines slop as analogous to spam: “shoddy or unwanted A.I. material in social networks, art, books and … in search results.” [172] Journalists have revealed concerns about the scale of low-grade created content with regard to social media material moderation, [173] the monetary incentives from social media companies to spread such material, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical term paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to find greater quality or preferred content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of produced material by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]
A paper published by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a photo of web pages, were device translated. Many of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, specifically for sentences that were translated throughout at least 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]
In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, revealed that she had stopped updating the information for several reasons: high costs for acquiring information from Reddit and Twitter, excessive concentrate on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing community, which “generative AI has contaminated the data”. [181]
The adoption of generative AI tools resulted in a surge of AI-generated content throughout multiple domains. A research study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely composed with LLM help. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of newly released computer technology documents and 16.9% of peer review text now incorporate content produced by LLMs. [183]
Visual material follows a similar pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that approximately 34 million images have been created daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been generated utilizing text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by models based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]
If AI-generated content is included in new data crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI designs, problems in the resulting designs may occur. [185] Training an AI model exclusively on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this procedure, where each new design is trained on the previous model’s output, causes progressive deterioration and ultimately results in a “model collapse” after numerous models. [186] Tests have actually been carried out with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the worth of data collected from real human interactions with systems might end up being progressively valuable in the presence of LLM-generated content in information crawled from the Internet.
On the other side, synthetic information is frequently utilized as an option to information produced by real-world occasions. Such data can be deployed to confirm mathematical designs and to train artificial intelligence designs while protecting user privacy, [188] including for structured information. [189] The technique is not restricted to text generation; image generation has actually been used to train computer vision models. [190]
Misuse in journalism
In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been utilizing a concealed internal AI tool to compose at least 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET posted corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]
In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a fake AI-generated interview with former racing chauffeur Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public appearances given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing accident. The story included 2 possible disclosures: the cover included the line “stealthily genuine”, and the interview consisted of an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired shortly afterwards amid the controversy. [192]
Other outlets that have published short articles whose content and/or byline have been validated or believed to be created by generative AI designs – frequently with false content, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – include:
– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]
In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had utilized generative AI to produce posts for a number of the aforementioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had actually produced tens of thousands of short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]
News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually presented news with anchors based on Generative AI designs, triggering concerns about job losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has actually traditionally been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, content creators or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically produced anchors have actually likewise been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]
In 2023, Google supposedly pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce newspaper article” based upon input data offered, such as “information of current events”. Some news business executives who viewed the pitch described it as” [taking] for given the effort that entered into producing accurate and artful news stories.” [224]
In February 2024, Google released a program to pay small publishers to compose three short articles per day using a beta generative AI design. The program does not need the understanding or permission of the websites that the publishers are utilizing as sources, nor does it require the published short articles to be labeled as being created or helped by these designs. [225]
Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have gone through cybersquatting, with articles developed by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]
United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have expressed concern that generative AI might have a harmful influence on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for explore generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI business developing a reliance for these news outlets. [235]
Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which sums up news stories, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly more decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]
In response to possible risks around the usage and abuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about decreasing audience trust, outlets all over the world, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually published standards around how they plan to utilize and not utilize AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]
In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are unpleasant with news produced by “mostly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “generally human with some help from AI”. The results of international studies reported that individuals were more unpleasant with news topics consisting of politics (46%), criminal offense (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]
Computer programs website
Technology website
Artificial general intelligence – Type of AI with comprehensive capabilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human creativity
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media produced with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that simulates discussion
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep learning technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of big language design
Large language design – Type of device knowing model
Music and artificial intelligence – Usage of synthetic intelligence to create music
Generative AI porn – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is created algorithmically rather than by hand
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of details retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term used in artificial intelligence
References
^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, companies, and federal governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, obtained January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced tasks apocalypse simply yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood writers’ fight against AI, people win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation refilled? Fears about the effect of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the initial on January 13, 2018, retrieved October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the initial on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York City, New York: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Short History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer helped procedure preparation: the state-of-the-art survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a traditional generative AI coordinator based upon the HSTS planning structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control element is a standard spacecraft mindset control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We likewise include an architectural component explicitly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine knowing: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Thorough Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with unsupervised learning”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some kind considering that ’15. ai’ released in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E develops possible images of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace people?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that combines 6 types of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-an effective AI design it says can go beyond GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, surpassing GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick new AI model – and a clever brand-new method to connect with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Live.'”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the chances and risks of foundation designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Buying Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please keep in mind that only English voices are available.; Another major function of 15. ai is its abundant emotional expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June stated that it used 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 “top quality” certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers described in a paper the ethical challenges that they encountered around the advancement of generative AI designs like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware producer stimulates debate over AI rights”. Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies by means of text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Expert System (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD model construct times with brand-new AI-driven part creation method|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more safe by design”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches closer as start-up Runway reveals brand-new model”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is fundamental. Runway states it’ll be making its brand-new generative video model, Gen-2, readily available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft adds OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system technologies such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of service software application … the brand-new A.I. functions, called Copilot, will be offered in some of the company’s most popular service apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories function simply got a big upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a revamped, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll have the ability to utilize generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert adventure”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative synthetic intelligence (AI) will turn into one of the most crucial functions for imaginative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to access and use Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot right now”. . Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 on your own maker or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can create a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are produced in your area, so you don’t require a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model in your home, you will need a computer system build with a powerful GPU that can manage the big amount of information and computation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I quite much only trust 2 LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * safety and security” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to halt sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while complying with rigorous U.S. export requirements that limit how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 totally free software application to identify fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We checked a brand-new ChatGPT-detector for instructors. It flagged an innocent student”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI might be impossible. That’s a huge problem for teachers”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI content for safety, White House says”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first regulation on expert system”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers elect tougher AI guidelines as draft relocate to final phase”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China says generative AI rules to use just to items for the general public”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New york city Times takes legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s also accepting the technology”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Started”. Wired. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York City Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court states”. Reuters. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what individuals think of AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking computer game illustrators’ jobs in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s video game art market reportedly decimated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of sophisticated tech”. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring a contract that clearly demands AI policies to safeguard authors and the works they create. … The future of generative artificial intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to replace labor-has end up being a crucial sticking point for actors going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more typically referred to as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘expert system positions an existential danger to creative occupations, and all actors and entertainers are worthy of agreement language that secures them from having their identity and skill made use of without approval and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools introduce out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries around the world are worried about AI being a danger to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are biased. Can logic assist in saving them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing bias and improving security in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No fast repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 highlighted the obstacles of predisposition in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying high-tech pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech could begin a worldwide face-off”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to increase anti-U.S. influence campaigns, officials state”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The fight versus fake news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the difficulties of generative technologies: Proposing the integration of synthetic intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software application race has started”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at risk from AI-driven disinformation, say specialists”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is believing? Global scramble to tackle deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users embrace AI voice clone tool to create celebrity hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake celeb audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that mimic popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music indications first-ever record offer with AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social networks platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘fraud czar’ forecasts the greatest risk is that deepfakes will eventually end up being boring”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we checked out online as use of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York City, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it indicates for climate modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of artificial intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological costs are skyrocketing – and mainly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer scientist describes the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design unexpectedly attempts to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The most recent wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Stunning Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has actually constantly been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, “it was manageable and typically recognizable. Large language models create text that masquerades as genuine language with objective behind it, even though there is none, and their output turn up everywhere,” she wrote. She gives the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “dig,” in a method that people do not, which has tossed off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Expert System. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively produced information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Danger to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Artificial Intelligence”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating a Synthetic Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET discovered mistakes in majority of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A magazine touted Michael Schumacher’s very first interview in years. It was actually AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ utilizing AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch pauses AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the initial on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today site. Did these writers exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioner “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian local newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Transfer To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Pertaining to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, Together With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for scam AI article about ladies’s usage of fake tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What remains in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated regional news, whatever – and nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for standard publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A national network of regional news sites is publishing AI-written articles under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter caught utilizing synthetic intelligence to produce fake quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine releases AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are penetrating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will update AI function after incorrect news informs”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the original on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated presenters to check out the news. The concern is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is genuine”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Has The Ability To Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Turned Into an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Precious Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech blog writers are shocked to find their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already attacking Oregon’s regional journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators caution AI might lead to ‘damage’ of local news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news deal”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta walked away from news. Now the company’s using it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s technique to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.