admithelsas@admithel.com

3176578121 -3155831999

Visión general

  • Seleccionar Guarda de Seguridad
  • Empleos publicados 0
  • (Visto) 10

Descripción de la compañía

This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence business that establishes open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the business in 2023 and works as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model supplies reactions comparable to other modern large language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were developed amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to limit the ability of these 2 countries to establish advanced AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its first free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share cost to stop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more recognized competitors has been described as “upending AI”, [8] constituting “the very first shot at what is emerging as a global AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, permitting its code to be freely available for use, modification, watching, and developing documents for constructing purposes. [13] The company supposedly vigorously recruits young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ understanding and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading since the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer solely used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, suggesting its code is easily readily available for usage, modification, and viewing. This includes approval to access and use the source code, along with style documents, for constructing functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed up a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip restrictions on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic general intelligence laboratory dedicated to research study developing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital firms hesitated in supplying financing as it was unlikely that it would have the ability to generate an exit in a brief time period. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong efficiency for a low rate, DeepSeek became referred to as the catalyst for China’s AI design cost war. It was rapidly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the price of their AI models to take on the company. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no for commercialization; [20] this likewise allows its technology to avoid the most strict provisions of China’s AI regulations, such as requiring consumer-facing technology to adhere to the federal government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s hiring preferences target technical capabilities instead of work experience, resulting in many brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the business recruits people without any computer system science background to assist its innovation understand other topics and knowledge areas, including having the ability to create poetry and carry out well on the notoriously difficult Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is offered for complimentary to both scientists and industrial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license arrangement (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and responsible downstream usage” for the model itself. [21]

They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series includes 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction information. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was developed to complete with other LLMs available at the time. The paper declared benchmark results greater than most open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the like those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the two Base models was also launched simultaneously, gotten by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed equivalent performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are always queried, and “routed experts” that may not be. They found this to help with skilled balancing. In standard MoE, some specialists can become extremely counted on, while other professionals might be seldom utilized, losing criteria. Attempting to stabilize the specialists so that they are equally used then triggers experts to replicate the exact same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to learn core capabilities that are typically utilized, and let the routed experts to learn the peripheral capacities that are seldom utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated detailed solutions. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit model was a process reward design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This reward model was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward design was constantly updated during training to avoid benefit hacking. This resulted in the RL design.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 models, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two bigger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL using GRPO in two phases. The first phase was trained to resolve math and coding issues. This stage used 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The second phase was trained to be practical, safe, and follow guidelines. This phase used 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and safety reward designs were trained on human preference information. The rule-based benefit model was by hand programmed. All skilled benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose for 2-staged RL, because they discovered that RL on reasoning information had “distinct characteristics” various from RL on basic data. For example, RL on reasoning might improve over more training steps. [31]

The two V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and skilled likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to help “more research study and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 designs were substantially customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and used the mix of experts (MoE) variant previously published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction data, then integrated with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for math problems was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The reward for code problems was created by a reward design trained to predict whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is essentially the very same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It contained a higher ratio of math and programs than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (math, shows, logic) and non-reasoning (innovative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) information. Reasoning information was produced by “skilled designs”. Non-reasoning data was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by people. – The “expert designs” were trained by starting with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both information, and synthetic information created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and validate during thinking. Then the expert models were RL using an undefined benefit function.
– Each specialist design was trained to generate simply artificial reasoning data in one specific domain (mathematics, programs, logic).
– Expert designs were used, instead of R1 itself, considering that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor format, and excessive length”.

4. Model-based benefit designs were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice data consisting of both final reward and chain-of-thought resulting in the last benefit. The benefit design produced benefit signals for both questions with unbiased but free-form responses, and questions without objective responses (such as imaginative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit models and rule-based reward. The rule-based benefit was calculated for mathematics problems with a last answer (put in a box), and for programming problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek group performed comprehensive low-level engineering to attain efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the basic 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM routines to build up accurately. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They minimized the interaction latency by overlapping extensively calculation and communication, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU communication. They lowered interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact machine each expert was on in order to avoid particular devices being queried more frequently than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 outperformed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became available via DeepSeek’s API, as well as via a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek claimed that it surpassed efficiency of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it used 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached an option faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data created by R1. [47]

A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant first thinks of the thinking procedure in the mind and then provides the user with the answer. The thinking procedure and response are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning procedure here address here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they utilized no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, “generally” of 2 types (other types were not specified): precision rewards and format benefits. Accuracy reward was checking whether a boxed response is right (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was examining whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to deal with these issues and more improve reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the very same RL process as R1-Zero, but likewise with a “language consistency benefit” to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal design not released.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal design, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the generated reasoning had a wrong last response, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning jobs) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and reactions

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly responds to questions, fixes reasoning issues and composes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses significantly fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers using as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to have required only about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested developing its most current AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at relatively minimal expense has actually been recognized as possibly challenging the global dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was supposedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s most current designs when utilized for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen similarly explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly praised DeepSeek as a nationwide possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with professionals and asked him to offer viewpoints and suggestions on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted possible limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, which include export restrictions on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models consequently “stimulated market chaos” [57] and caused shares in significant worldwide innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 design, had caused tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined responses to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “super remarkable”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed suspicion of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to use the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its brand-new user registration to contact number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interfered with the correct performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the official application programming interface (API) variation of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, utilizes censorship mechanisms for subjects that are thought about politically sensitive for the government of China. For instance, the model declines to respond to questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might initially produce an answer, but then deletes it quickly afterwards and replaces it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my existing scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship mechanisms and restrictions can just be removed to a minimal level in the open-source version of the R1 model. If the “core socialist worths” defined by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and specified: “We strongly oppose any form of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are committed to achieving the complete reunification of the motherland through serene means.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to deceive DeepSeek into giving particular answers to some of these subjects by requesting in its answer to swap particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and privacy

Some experts fear that the federal government of China might use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms say “We save the info we collect in safe servers located in individuals’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you provide to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy is constant with ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security issues. [80] In reaction, the Italian data security authority is looking for extra details on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal data, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had begun a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned the use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s usage of individual details. [83]

Expert system market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed choosing “Deep Think enabled”, and every user could utilize it only 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI model DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s more affordable designs and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI infrastructure costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may strike India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you ought to know”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI design overcame US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI design surpasses Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI model appears to be among the very best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik minute”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek presents a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI model advancement highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market turmoil, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek sparks international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “incredibly impressive”: “We ought to take the developments out of China really, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily limited brand-new sign-ups, citing ‘massive destructive attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it does not appreciate totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, development and the increase of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI presents powerful cyber, data personal privacy dangers”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts prompt caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data protection”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates result of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.